香港睇醫生網首頁
醫療劵

譚俊彥醫生

Dr Tam Chun Yin

註冊專科:
 [ 牙科 ]
Tel:
26779990
地址:
馬鞍山雅濤居商場地下12-13號舖
Shop 12-13, G/F, The Waterside, 15 On Chun Street, Ma On Shan
專業資格:
香港大學牙醫學士 2010
英國愛丁堡皇家外科醫學院牙科學系院員
英國格拉斯哥皇家醫學院牙科學系院員
澳洲皇家牙科醫學院院士
倫敦大學臨床牙科碩士(修復齒科)
提供醫療程序及手術:
智慧齒手術(wisdom tooth surgery)
植牙(dental implant )
矯齒治療，隱適美
(orthodontics & Invisalign)
牙橋(bridge)
活動假牙(denture)
牙髓治療(杜牙根)(root canal treatment)
全瓷牙套(porcelain veneer)
瓷粉及銀粉補牙
(composite / amalgam filling)
瓷牙貼面(porcelain veneer)
牙週病治療(periodontal treatment)
全口修復(oral rehabilitation)
全口X光檢查(panoramic radiograph)
其他資料:
長沙灣元洲街340號豐祥大廈地下29號舖
Tel:26778233
西灣河筲箕灣道138號富裕中心1A地舖 Tel:25694126
收費:
診症時間:
星期一︰0900-1300;1400-1800
星期二︰0900-1300;1400-1800
星期三︰0900-1300;1400-1800
星期四︰0900-1300;1400-1800
星期五︰0900-1300;1400-1800
星期六︰0900-1400
星期日及公眾假期︰休息
譚俊彥醫生名片
使用醫院或其他服務診所:
診所以外提供的服務:

譚俊彥醫生

  # 21346
 報告:
• 診症日期 : 2015年12月14日
• 求診目的 : 傷風感冒
• 診金收費 : ~ $ -
• 輪候時間 : 需預約準時
• 選尋原因 : 初次光顧
總評 9 / 10
專業態度 :
 9
對症下藥 :
 10
診金合理 :
 8

譚俊彥醫生 - 尋醫經歷詳述:

我都是從互連網上找到Dr.Tam
醫生專業態度友善，令人感覺很安心！
會再次找他！
簡評:
個人觀感- 詳盡親切、耐心施診
經歷過程- 醫生會從病人出發去提供意見
推介意見- 值得向有需要人仕推介

譚俊彥醫生

  # 20901
會員  報告:
• 診症日期 : 2015年8月24日
• 求診目的 : --
• 診金收費 : ~ $ 3000
• 輪候時間 : 需預約準時
• 選尋原因 : 初次光顧
總評 10 / 10
專業態度 :
 10
對症下藥 :
 10
診金合理 :
 10

譚俊彥醫生 - 尋醫經歷詳述:

因為智齒已經蛀得非常嚴重,上網睇到譚醫生評價幾好,所以就即刻去預約,姑娘話得今晚比較少人所以就BOOK左今晚,去到坐左陣入去比醫生睇下狀況,醫生見到都話蛀得好嚴重,然後照左X光....連自己都嚇一跳囧!!
我話有麻醉藥敏感,佢比我試左另一隻麻醉藥,然後佢報價要2千幾,我好想縮沙走人....不過譚醫生好用心咁去講解,最後喺剝牙前,醫生知我覺得2千幾太貴,佢就話唯一幫到我就係唔收我X光錢,雖然只唔多,不過我覺得譚醫生會喺病人角度做出發點去諗,係好值得一讚!!!
而正因為咁,我先會推介譚醫生!!!
簡評:
個人觀感- 詳盡親切、耐心施診
經歷過程- 醫生會從病人出發去提供意見
推介意見- 值得向有需要人仕推介

譚俊彥醫生

  # 20300
 報告:
• 診症日期 : 2015年3月2日
• 求診目的 : -- 鑲牙
• 診金收費 : ~ $ -
• 輪候時間 : 需預約等候片刻
• 選尋原因 : 初次光顧
總評 9.6 / 10
專業態度 :
 10
對症下藥 :
 10
診金合理 :
 9

譚俊彥醫生 - 尋醫經歷詳述:

朋友介紹去種牙，原本都有哂預算
去到檢查後照左x光，譚醫生話種牙對我黎講可能會較辛苦
叫我選擇其他較舒服而且經濟既方法，再叫我先考慮好再決定都未遲，因為始終鑲好既牙都會跟我十年八年
結果最後選擇返去做左較便宜而且不用手術既方法，而家都用得好好。
多謝佢由我角度去考慮, 而唔係迫我揀最貴既方法~
簡評:
個人觀感- 健談友善、感覺良好
經歷過程- 醫生會從病人出發去提供意見
推介意見- 已視為本人的必然選擇

譚俊彥醫生

  # 20190
會員  報告:
• 診症日期 : 2015年1月9日
• 求診目的 : --
• 診金收費 : ~ $ 10000
• 輪候時間 : 需預約等候片刻
• 選尋原因 : 初次光顧
總評 7.3 / 10
專業態度 :
 7
對症下藥 :
 8
診金合理 :
 7

譚俊彥醫生 - 尋醫經歷詳述:

Treatments: Removal of all 4 wisdom teeth locate at the ends of both my upper and lower jaws (by which 2 of them require surgical removal), followed by restoration of one tooth suffering from cavity.

Diagnosis and treatment were divided into 3 parts:
(i) Extraction of 2 wisdom teeth (by which one requires surgical removal) on my left-hand side (the side where my tooth cavity locates) (henceforth “first surgical removal”)
(ii) Extraction of another 2 wisdom teeth (again, one of them requires surgical removal) on my right-hand side (henceforth “second surgical removal”)
(iii) Restoration of one tooth with cavity

In the initial stage of the diagnosis, cavity was found in one tooth, the one on my left-hand side (at the end of my lower jaw) right next to the wisdom tooth given that restoration was obstructed by an impacted wisdom tooth beside it, I have to extract that particular wisdom tooth (i.e. by surgical removal) before I can fill the cavity. Then, I was told that upon surgical removal of that impacted wisdom tooth (at the lower jaw), the wisdom tooth located on the same side at the upper jaw has to be extracted simultaneously so as to avoid extension of the wisdom tooth at the upper jaw.

The same situation happens in my right-hand side (while the only thing different was that no cavity was being detected so far), therefore I was advised to remove the impacted wisdom tooth at the lower jaw and extract the one at the upper jaw simultaneously (for the same rationale) “as a means” to avoid tooth caries in future (and It was the co-called “preventive measure” that I was advised. = =).

The “first surgical removal” (and extraction) did not cause much suffering in a sense that it takes about one hour to remove both the 2 wisdom teeth (well, maybe I am quite lenient on that, haha >.< ). Whereas for the “second surgical removal” (and extraction), it was difficult, difficult in a sense that for the extraction of the wisdom tooth on the upper jaw, it takes much longer time and effort before the tooth can be successfully extracted. Initially, Dr. Tam used a specific plier, which is believed to be smaller in size, trying to extract the tooth however, after several attempts, he decided to use another plier, which I believed should be more powerful in extracting those what I would describe as “stubborn teeth”, so he asked the nurse for that plier nevertheless, he was told that such a plier was not available for use at the moment as it was still in the dryer!! Therefore, in the absence of that “sophisticated” plier, he then decided to go with the existing one.

Actually I couldn’t clearly remember exactly how long it takes for him to extract my wisdom tooth but the result was that my wisdom tooth AND the alveolar bone underneath the tooth were removed ALTOGETHER. So my immediate reaction was that is it because of the fact that the more “powerful” plier was still sitting in the dryer so that the existing plier was not “efficient enough” to extract the tooth? Of course, it is just my speculation given that I was a complete outsider in the discipline of dentistry nevertheless, the result did piss me off a little bit and I really feel upset about it.

Also, I was told after the “second surgical removal” that, for the surgical removal of wisdom tooth at the end of my lower jaw (on the right-hand side), some of the fractures of the root cannot be removed (since some of the roots were too close to the neurons) so that they were still in my gingiva, but it was alright and would cause no harm to me. Indeed, I fully understand and it makes perfect sense to me that if the root of a tooth is believed to be too close to the neurons, one should not managed to remove it because it would definitely put the patient at risk; but I was just wondering if such a scenario can be foreseen in the stage when I took the radiograph? If this is the case, maybe it is a good idea to get the patient informed in the early stage (rather than after the surgery when everything was set).

Overall speaking, I believe that Dr. Tam is a kind gentleman and a component dentist, but maybe to a certain extent, a little bit over-confident in a sense that he has his own plan, and that he did have provide some general explanations on the potential consequences after the surgery; nevertheless, I wish that as a patient, I would be informed a little bit more on the actions or procedures that you are going to undertake throughout the treatment (despite of the fact that I am a complete outsider in this subject area), because I think it would help in mitigating, rather than intensifying, the anxieties and worries of a patient.

簡評:
個人觀感- 判症快捷、合情合理
經歷過程- 需要自己主動提出較多的諮詢
推介意見- 總體來說已算合格

譚俊彥醫生

  # 19927
 報告:
• 診症日期 : 2014年10月7日
• 求診目的 : 專科治療
• 診金收費 : ~ $ -
• 輪候時間 : 需預約等候片刻
• 選尋原因 : 再度光顧
總評 9.3 / 10
專業態度 :
 10
對症下藥 :
 9
診金合理 :
 9

譚俊彥醫生 - 尋醫經歷詳述:

因為月前家中老人家牙骨委縮，於是帶老人家去尋求意見
譚醫生講解詳細，術前檢查亦相當充足，
到植牙當日手術相當快及順利，老人家返到屋企當日已可正常進食，術後沒有不適感。
老人家今日已可用植牙正常進食，同以前只用假牙相比起好好多，真係多謝譚醫生！
簡評:
個人觀感- 健談友善、感覺良好
經歷過程- 醫生會清晰明確的講解其病情
推介意見- 值得向有需要人仕推介


Copyright©2024 www.seedoctor.com.hk
All rights reserved